
Like most of you, I had a tough time getting into the book. However, after about chaper 11 it started to pick up and I found myself wanting to know how it was going to end. It wasn't a book that I just couldn't put down, but I didn't dread reading it either.
I think it would have been a lot more enjoyable if I had read Jane Eyre (and the other books mentioned) more recently. They give a good enough summary of it in the book for those that have never read it, but I think I would have gotten more from the book if I was up to date on all of the books that they mentioned. Also, I am completely clueless as far as the Crimean War is concerned, so that plot line didn't hold my interest very well.
All that aside, I think the book was very well put together and I can understand why it was on the New York Times Bestseller List. The writing was...intense. That's really the only word to describe it. I'm sure for anyone that is current on English literature this book was incredible.
Things I liked:
-I liked that the characters from the books could come into reality and visa versa. I really enjoyed the whole Rochester part and the relationship he had with Thursday.
-I liked when her Dad would come to visit and the silly things that he would say.
-I like the ending (I won't expound because I don't want to spoil it), but I'll just say that I liked how Rochester helped Thursday in the end.
-I liked the loopy uncle and the book worm invention.
Things I didn't like:
-I was really annoyed with the language, especially the completely unnecessary F-Words found in chapter 10 (I think that's the one). The language dies down by the end of the book, but come on, did he really need to include all that?
-The whole Vampire/Werewolf/Silver bullet thing. Again this is a spoiler, so I won't expound, but I think that there could have been a better way for Thursday to get a silver bullet other than the wasted chapter with the vampire. It seemed like it was just one more oddity with the world to add, and for me, was overdoing it.
-I got bored with all the different ways they tried to make Shakespeare a fake. Again, I think for Enlish Lit. majors, this was probably a great debate, but it really just left me bored.
Kellie's Questions:1. I liked the idea of the importance of literature, but honestly, I'd like to think that the whole world wouldn't crumble if one book was changed. :) I think the murders of real people would have been a bit bigger issue than the possible elimination of a fictional character.
2. The writing wasn't that big of an issue for me as much as the topics. (Crimea and Shakespeare)
3. I would read more of the Thursday Next novels, but first I would want to read the books that are going to be spotlighted in them so I knew the characters better.
4. I agree with the play on names...kind of silly.
5. I imagined Thursday as someone in her mid-twenties (probably because Mike and I have been watching Buffy). This became a problem when she talked about the Crimea War and how long she had been ignoring Landon. That bit made me really sad. What a waste of years...
6. I liked Thursday and Landon a lot. I think Hades was a perfect bad guy and his dialog with others kept me laughing. I liked the Dad but think he was too small of a character. The uncle was funny, and Rochester made me want to read Jane Eyre again.
So in a nutshell, I'm not jumping up and down for the novel or anything, but I would say it was a very well put-together book and worth reading for sure.